The Decline of the
Guilds and the Industrial Revolution
In the late 1700s and
early 1800s, the guild system was all but destroyed by new economic and
technological forces. After a prolonged period of social upheaval and
resistance, craft-based work gave way to mass production—the new economic
paradigm of the Industrial Revolution.
The traditional
production techniques of the craftsmen required a high degree of skill.
The long learning curves involved in mastering these techniques amounted
to a barrier to entry which assured each guild’s monopoly over a
particular sector of the economy. In the late 1700s, however, inventors
created machines that enabled non-skilled workers to perform work that had
traditionally been the domain of skilled guild members. Mechanization
proceeded at an especially rapid pace in the textile industry. Within a
few decades, inventions like the power loom, the spinning mule, and the
shearing frame made the skills of thousands of craftspeople virtually
obsolete.
At the same time, a
new economic entity was emerging: the mass production entrepreneur. Before
the late 1700s, merchants who bought finished goods from skilled craftsmen
paid minimal attention to the processes that actually produced the goods.
Now, though, some merchants had become aware of the numerous markups and
inefficiencies that resulted as goods and raw materials passed from one
craftsperson to another. The merchants realized that by purchasing raw
materials in bulk and coordinating the subsequent flow of goods between
processes, they could save costs and thereby increase their process. These
merchants became the first practitioners of supply chain management—which
was known in the late 1700s as “factoring.”
The practice of
factoring revealed the efficiencies that were possible with strategically
aligned production processes. The next step would be to combine factoring
with the new inventions that enabled practically anyone to do the work of
a craftsman. Large numbers of workers would be gathered under a single
roof to produce vast numbers of finished goods. This system--which is today
taken for granted--was dubbed “the factory system.” The factory system
spelled the final demise of the old guilds.
Not all guild members
were willing to accept the change. In 1811, authorities in Nottingham, England received threatening
letters signed by “General Ned Ludd and the Army of Redressers.” Shortly
thereafter, displaced craftsmen began breaking into factories at night and
destroying mass production equipment. This became known as the Luddite
movement—a violent backlash against the factory system and the new
realties of the Industrial Revolution. While the casualties of Luddite
revolts were normally limited to machinery, people were occasionally
killed in the disturbances. In 1812, a Luddite mob killed a mill owner,
and the Luddites themselves were sometimes injured or killed by private
security guards and police.
Part 2